Denialism.com Banner


Denialism.com - A resource for countering denialist organizations, tactics and arguments. Don't Confuse Denialism with Debate!


About Denialism.com

Who are we?
What is Denialism?
Who are the Denialists?
The Denialist Deck of Cards






link to xml feed
Subscribe 

with Bloglines








www

denialism




Add to Technorati Favorites

Sunday, April 1, 2007

April Fools
Egnor says it was all a joke.



Happy April Fools'! (Or Dawkins' Day, as some of you might know it.)

Over the past month I have engaged in what my friend Bill Dembski ludicly refers to as "street theatre". My posts here have been an outlandish parody of the bona fide Intelligent Design position, liberally injected with many of the more simplistic errors of the Young Earth Creationists. My purpose was to see how far we could go before the gullible Darwinists realized they were being taken for a ride. The Discovery Institute has graciously aided (and abetted!) by allowing me a voice on this weblog and by giving me valuable feedback on my comedic output. Together, we have succeeded in duping the Darwinists (like the foul-mouthed duncecaps at the Panda's Thumb and Scienceblogs).

Our ruse was bound to work for a while; after all, Darwinists eagerly want to believe that Intelligent Design is nothing but "dressed up" Creationism. However, I'm astounded we made it this far, as I truly feared that the Darwinian horde would catch on sooner---but they are even denser than we had expected. Bill Dembski wagered a bottle of Macallan that I would not persevere to this day---but I have, and I will collect. I also owe Casey Luskin a beer; his courageous acting in our podcasts deserves an Oscar.

Thank you, Darwinists, for giving the Discovery Institute plenty of laughs by coining such ad hominem terms as "egnoramus", "egnorance", "Dr. Egnore", and "egnorrants". Not since middle school have I endured such puerile taunts. It was, after all, too easy to exploit the Darwinists' blind bigotry for Intelligent Design theorists. Regardless of how ridiculous my posts were, the Darwinians seriously thought that I was sincere. The doctors in my medical school deal with the realities of microevolution daily (e.g., the evolution of bacterial resistance to antibiotics), yet the Darwinists willingly believed that I could be "egnorant" of these facts.

The Discovery Institute and I hope you have enjoyed our elaborate game. As Bill Dembski has said, we should strive to "be more fun at parties". But on a serious note, and with apologies to Sir Ronald Fisher, Intelligent Design is not Creationism. Intelligent Design theorists embrace evolutionary science and its implications for modern biology and medicine. Common descent is a fine working hypothesis; natural selection can produce some limited forms of information; it would be foolish to deny these. We, as ID theorists, simply recognize one additional fact about our Universe that the Church of Darwin refuses to: when all else fails, laughter is still the best medicine.

Good night and God Bless.

Or did he?

Look closely...

Labels: ,




8 Comments:

Chris said...

This is so contrived, it's hard to believe.

It reminds me of the guy on Elimidate explaining why the rumors that he had only one testicle were false.

April 1, 2007 12:34 PM,

 
Mark said...

Hehe.

Which part, that Dembski and Egnor did this? Or that this actually exists?

Like I say, look closely.

April 1, 2007 12:43 PM,

 
Chris said...

Best comment:

What exactly are they trying to prove? They think we're gullible because we think they're idiotic?

April 1, 2007 12:48 PM,

 
Chris said...

Oh, I've never looked at their URL, so it was not apparent that it was a spoof site.

April 1, 2007 12:54 PM,

 
Chris said...

And today's post on Evolution News *.org* is bizarrely stupid: http://www.evolutionnews.org/2007/04/what_if_darwinism_were_right.html#more

April 1, 2007 12:54 PM,

 
Mark said...

There's a few other hints. The Vitruvian man is wearing an eye-patch (for FSM-pirate goodness) and it is the "Discover institute" rather than Discovery.

April 1, 2007 9:34 PM,

 
Anonymous said...

This was all a joke by the good folks at "The Panda's Thumb" to poke fun at how absurd Egnor's comments are. PZ Myers can elaborate:

http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2007/04/its_april_2nd.php#more

April 2, 2007 8:23 AM,

 
al wallace said...

You gotta love those guys at PT, although the shrill tone of some of them does bother me. I wish they would just stick to arguing the merits of an issue and knock off the name-calling. It just makes them look like a bunch of sophomores (in the literal sense) and gives the ID folks more ammo (i.e. if they don't offer a more substantive argument, perhaps they don't have one).

April 2, 2007 6:00 PM,

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home