Denialism.com Banner


Denialism.com - A resource for countering denialist organizations, tactics and arguments. Don't Confuse Denialism with Debate!


About Denialism.com

Who are we?
What is Denialism?
Who are the Denialists?
The Denialist Deck of Cards






link to xml feed
Subscribe 

with Bloglines








www

denialism




Add to Technorati Favorites

Monday, April 23, 2007

New Category of Crank
I'm thinking of adding a new "technophobe" type of denialist or crank, and my first nomination will be the Independent, and specifically their environmental editor Geoffrey Lean. His list of articles reads like the newspaper version of the Chicken Little story, and the latest? How WiFi creates "electric smog" that is harmful to children.

Britain's top health protection watchdog is pressing for a formal investigation into the hazards of using wireless communication networks in schools amid mounting concern that they may be damaging children's health, 'The Independent on Sunday' can reveal.

Sir William Stewart, the chairman of the Health Protection Agency, wants pupils to be monitored for ill effects from the networks - known as Wi-Fi - which emit radiation and are being installed in classrooms across the nation.

Sir William - who is a former chief scientific adviser to the Government, and has chaired two official inquiries into the hazards of mobile phones - is adding his weight to growing pressure for a similar examination of Wi-Fi, which some scientists fear could cause cancer and premature senility.

...

This week the Professional Association of Teachers, which represents 35,000 staff across the country, will write to Alan Johnson, Secretary of State for Education, to demand an official inquiry. Virtually no studies have been carried out into Wi-Fi's effects on pupils, but it gives off radiation similar to emissions from mobile phones and phone masts.

Recent research has linked radiation from mobiles to cancer and to brain damage. And many studies have found disturbing symptoms in people near masts.



Oh please. Electronic smog? Radiation? This is some pretty silly fear of radio signals. WiFi and cell phones emit radiation the same way your computer screen emits radiation, that is, it is non-ionizing radiation. How have people become so fearful of any part of the EM spectrum that isn't visible light? Is this a failure of the schools to give people a proper physics education? Read about health issues related to radio frequency radiation here and about cell phones here.

Cell phones have not been proven to cause cancer despite intense study. WiFi, again using a non-interacting part of the EM spectrum is not causing senility or cancer. This is technophobic fear-mongering and the Independent is absolutely full of it.

This guy must be working as a double agent for the global warming denialists, because when you put articles about global warming (and his are pretty shill examples to start with) next to this garbage science it damages the fact that there is a great deal of real research and study of climate change. It is confusing to readers, I'm sure, because there is no credible research that radiowaves from cell phones or WiFi have ill health effects. This is hysteria and undermines the credibility of legitimate environmentalism.

I rate these Independent articles accordingly.

Labels: ,




3 Comments:

Chris said...

The radio wave = cancer community is huge in San Francisco. They're clearly cranks, and even if you say "I AGREE WITH YOU, CELL PHONES CAUSE CANCER, HELP ME, I'M BEING KILLED BY ALL THE PHONES," they just continue on and on and on. It's like they're in transmit only mode, and no matter what facial expression you make when being abused by their craziness, they just continue on and on.

These people aren't technophones. It's something else. They're well intentioned, but they use scare tactics. And you can't argue with them, because they're so well informed you'd have to quit your job to keep up.

They've almost made me think that the precautionary rule is bad, because they can come up with the craziest theories to stop public works (such as free wifi in SF).

April 22, 2007 10:35 PM,

 
Mark said...

Maybe we should call them radiation cranks. People who believe that all wavelengths of the EM spectrum are equally harmful despite there being no proof.

April 23, 2007 11:12 AM,

 
Ted said...

Protection would aptly be -- the tinfoil hat.

I have several.

April 23, 2007 4:52 PM,

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home